From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jul 06 2003 - 23:56:23 GMT-3
Badger,
Recommend you tag routes as they are brought into each routing protocol, and
don't let that protocol give the routes back to the original routing protoco
(especially if you are doing mutual redistribution on two routers):
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 64 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 match int ext route-map o2e
!
router ospf 64
redistribute eigrp 100 metric-type 1 subnets route-map e2o
!
route-map o2e deny 10
match tag 100
!
route-map o2e permit 30
set tag 64
!
route-map e2o deny 10
match tag 64
!
route-map e2o permit 30
set tag 100
HTH, Kym
>From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
>Reply-To: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
>To: "'badger'" <badger@pongo.org>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: OSPF<->EIGRP Mutual Redistribution - little long
>Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 22:31:54 -0400
>
> > Still no response to my question. Bottom line is that whenever I'm
> > doing mutual redistribution and throw the "redistribute connected"
> > under with eigrp or ospf, their actual connect routes are dropped from
> > redistribution. This is driving me nuts, is my question that bad?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
>
>
>
>I have noticed that the effects of redistribution depend on IOS version
>and platform.
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:26 GMT-3