From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 00:52:05 GMT-3
Hi, John.
Basically, it's this. I just tried it and it worked:
_____
|
R1 e0 in area 0
| R1 s0 in area 1
R2 s0 in area 1
| (R2)e0 in area 1
__|___
|
R3 e0 in area 1
|
------- e1 (R3) in area 2
What I meant was if I could create a virtual link from R3 directly to R1. I
thought it might need to go to R2 from R3 first then I would have to create
a virtual link to R2 from R1 (two virtual links on R2). I tried this first
and it worked, but then I tried a straight V-link from r3 to r1 and it
worked.
Thanks,
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:41 PM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: virtual-links
Hello Danny,
Could you be more specific in your question?
In other words do you mean interfaces of the virtual-link connected to Area
0? Or possible the interfaces that connect to the virtual-link, be adjacent
within the same network? Sincerely, Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:34 PM
Subject: virtual-links
> Hello, group. I'm trying to find this info on CCO, but can't. Do
> both
ends of a virtual-link need to be directly connected?
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:20 GMT-3