From: Joe Martin (jmartin@capitalpremium.net)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 17:25:28 GMT-3
Bob,
I do not think you read the original question very carefully. He is NOT
trying to configure DLSW on the 3550. He is configuring DLSW on routers
attached to the 3550, and when he issues the bridge-group 1 command on the
router interface attached to the 3550, the switch interface is removed from
the vlan to which it was configured.
I think most of us are aware that you CANNOT configure DLSW on a 3550.
Jonathan, correct me if I am wrong.
HTH,
Joe Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
boby2kusa@hotmail.com
Sent: June 30, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Jonathan V Hays; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: bridging removes port from 3550 vlan
Nope, the only bridging it supports is fall back bridging. It kind of
defeats the purpose of vlan when you end up bridging them anyway. Why not
put them all in a single vlan?
Check the config guide on fall back bridging it might work for you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
To: <boby2kusa@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: bridging removes port from 3550 vlan
Thanks for the response. However, IMHO this does not seem like an
adequate theory to explain the switch behavior. Before the 3550s we had
a Catalyst 2950 which did not produce this behavior. And certainly you
could say that the 2950 does not support DLSW, since there is no mention
of it in any of the 2950 documentation.
Part of the point of DLSW is that it encapsulates nonroutable protocols
so you can bridge over the WAN. Let's say there is an ethernet
connection in the middle of the WAN traversal route. How exactly does
the 3550 switch know that it is forwarding a DLSW packet? And at layer
2, why would it care? It should be just another frame.
And besides, usually the ports forwarding DLSW frames in our scenarios
are WAN ports (although this depends on the scenario). The ethernet
ports are generally just configured with "bridge-group 1" and in our lab
there is no workstation generating SNA or NetBIOS frames. Those ports
are connected to the 3550 and should be pretty quiet.
As I implied in my original post with "(or simple bridging)," we get the
same behavior if we configure simple bridging on several ethernet router
ports (e.g., "bridge-group 1" and "bridge 1 protocol ieee"). I'm sure
that the 3550 supports bridging.
Still mystified,
Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of boby2kusa@hotmail.com
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: Jonathan V Hays; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: bridging removes port from 3550 vlan
>
>
> That's because the 3550 doe snot support DLSW. I have
> learned through out
> the years reading CCO release notes that if it does not
> mention support on
> particular protocol it does not support it. If anybody else
> think this is
> not true they can chime in and provide proof.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:35 AM
> Subject: bridging removes port from 3550 vlan
>
>
> > My lab study partner has a pair of catalyst 3550s running
> the latest EMI
> > image, (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(13)EA1a.
> >
> > Whenever we configure DLSW (or simple bridging) the
> fastethernet 3550
> > switch ports connected to the DLSW-enabled routers are
> removed from the
> > configured VLAN. You can execute "show vlan" on the switch
> and the DLSW
> > ports are missing. Removing the DLSW configuration from the router
> > restores the port to the VLAN. It goes without saying, but
> I'll say it
> > anyway, we have tried various ports and rebooted switches
> and routers
> > but that does nothing to fix this problem.
> >
> > The Cisco Bug Toolkit did not give me any hits on this problem.
> >
> > Does anyone have any ideas on this one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:15 GMT-3