protocol redistribution and route installation

From: Punchi-san (clapun@graduate.hku.hk)
Date: Sat Jun 28 2003 - 13:17:04 GMT-3

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: QOS and custom queueing"
• Previous message: Jean-Francois Vaillancourt: "RE: CCIE 11874 - and some reflexions on the nature of the beast"
• Next in thread: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Punchi-san: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group,

Just want to clarify the concept of protocol redistribution :

R1 has both OSPF and EIGRP running and a route is originally learned from
OSPF. If I redistribute the route from OSPF to EIGRP, why the OSPF route
still get installed into the routing table. Isn't that the default admin.
distance of EIGRP less than OSPF ? The route did install in the EIGRP
topoloy database. Any hints appreciated.

thanks
punchi-san

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: QOS and custom queueing"
• Previous message: Jean-Francois Vaillancourt: "RE: CCIE 11874 - and some reflexions on the nature of the beast"
• Next in thread: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Punchi-san: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: protocol redistribution and route installation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:13 GMT-3