From: Michael Needham \(mineedha\) (mineedha@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 15:47:00 GMT-3
Yeah, I got confused in the archive.... Answer??? Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
patcunnin@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Jason Cash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: redist of connected routes
Did you ever get an answer? It appears that you have
to redistribute connect in both routing protocols.
Thanks
--- Jason Cash <cash2001@swbell.net> wrote:
> I had asked this one back in April...here is a link
> in the Archive:
>
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200304/msg00083.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of patcunnin@yahoo.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:53 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> If OSPF is doing a redistribute connected for
> loopback0 and I'm redistributing OSPF into EIGRP.
> Will
> the loopback get propagated in EIGRP or do I need to
> do a redistribute connected under EIGRP? It appears
> that I have to do a redistribute connected under
> EIGRP. I thought ISIS was the only protocol that
> needed a redist connected?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:11 GMT-3