From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 12:50:13 GMT-3
Thx, connie;
Have you got resilience paths in you case? What routing protocls are you
running? Can this protocol still running after you activated the
bridge-group configuration?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
Connie Nie
<CNie@EPLUS.com> To: "'wing_lam@jossynergy.com'" <wing_lam@jossynergy.com>
Sent by: cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
nobody@groupstudy Subject: RE: UDP flooding
.com
06/23/2003 10:47
PM
Please respond to
Connie Nie
All I used were:
1. bridge-group
2. ip forward-protocol udp xx
3. ip forward-protocol spanning-tree.
I did not use the access-list.
Connie
-----Original Message-----
From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com [mailto:wing_lam@jossynergy.com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Connie Nie
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: UDP flooding
Yes, Connie, I have configure this, but without understand the meaning :-)
If I configure bridge-group on one interface, I found that it will becomes
briged and routing protocols cannot be run anymore, is it true in your
case? How can I made only UDP broadcast with port 2000 forward and all
others routed?
Also, what is the use of access-list 201 deny 0xffff 0x0000 in example?
Thx a lot,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
Connie Nie
<CNie@EPLUS.com> To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy Subject: RE: UDP flooding
.com
06/23/2003 10:02
PM
Please respond to
Connie Nie
I played with that a while ago. Did you use "ip forward-protocol
Spanning-tree?"
Connie
-----Original Message-----
From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com [mailto:wing_lam@jossynergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:54 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: UDP flooding
Hi, Group
I am refering this link for UDP broadcast flooding:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs006.htm
And I can only find this example.
Any body has success implement this? I found that after I activated
"bridge-group" command in the interface, all the routing protocol fails due
to bridging. Is the command "bridge-group 1 input-type-list 201" used for
control whihc for bridging and which for routing?
This link mentioning the access-list 201as "access-list 201 deny 0xffff
0x0000"
Is it wrong?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
James.Jackson@bro
adwing.com To:
wing_lam@jossynergy.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc:
06/23/2003 11:56 Subject: RE: UDP flooding
AM
do you mean UDP broadcast forwarding via "ip helper-address" ?
-----Original Message-----
From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com [mailto:wing_lam@jossynergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: UDP flooding
Hi group,
Can anybody pass me a link or copy on how to implement UDP flooding? I have
searched the web and doc cd but still gives the same example.
I suspect the input-type-list 201 is wrong for this example. Can anybody
explain to me about this?
The example is at:
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:07 GMT-3