From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 11:24:44 GMT-3
Thx, Dave;
MADMAN
<dave@interprise. To: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
com> cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ATM config
06/23/2003 10:11
PM
Please respond to
dmadlan
wing_lam@jossynergy.com wrote:
> Hi group;
>
> I would like to know whether the following two style of ATM configuration
>
> atm pvc 75 2 75 aal5snap 1000 1000 oam 10
>
> and
>
> pvc 2/75
> vbr-rt 100 1000 20
> protocol ip inarp
>
> I know that the Cisco suggest we use the second one after 11.3 T, but I
> found that either one can do the same.
>
> Which one is better? which one I should use in the R&S LAB exam?
I don't think one is so much better than the other, you can configure
one side of a PVC the old way and the other side the new way and it
works fine. The main concern may be if you use the old style and Cisco
eventually drops support for it and you upgrade, your config is no
longer valid!
I would guess the lab uses the newer style.
Dave
>
> Thx,
> BBD (Big Black Dog)
> DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
> immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original
message.
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:06 GMT-3