From: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1) (mohit.sharma@hp.com)
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 - 11:49:00 GMT-3
Hi ,
Sorry to disappoint you, but did not get any response on this one. So I
thought maybe it was a stupid question.
However after reading some more into this, I realized that actually it makes
sense as CBWFQ is used to allocate guranteed bandwitdh to the outgoing
packet, and it actually does'nt make an awful lot of sense to use this
command for inputs :-)
Thats my opinion, however I would love to hear some expert comments on this
from the group.
Smiles,
Mohit.
-----Original Message-----
From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com [mailto:wing_lam@jossynergy.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:37 PM
To: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CBWFQ
Hi, Mohit;
Sorry that I missing several mails; personally I would also want to know
the answer of your question, has you got the answer now? Would you mind
tell me if yes?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
"SHARMA,MOHIT
(HP-Germany,ex1)" To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com
<mohit.sharma@hp. cc:
com> Subject: CBWFQ
Sent by:
nobody@groupstudy
.com
06/16/2003 06:33
PM
Please respond to
"SHARMA,MOHIT
(HP-Germany,ex1)"
Hi All,
Cisco says on one of their DQOS training slides, that CBWFQ is enabled ONLY
with ""service-policy output"" command?
Could somebody pleae explain why this is so??
AS LLQ can be used also for input.
THanks,
Mohit.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:00 GMT-3