dlsw and priority-list

From: Oliver Ziltener (ziltener@netcloud.ch)
Date: Sat Jun 14 2003 - 12:39:27 GMT-3

• Next message: badger: "BGP advertise-map non-exist-map"
• Previous message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: dlsw lite"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

When I use PQ and I should give DLSW+ the highest level

should I do this

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065

or

priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high

Or does both the same?
Is the first statement only for TCP encapsultation and the second for dlsw+
lite (llc2)

thanks for the feedback

• Next message: badger: "BGP advertise-map non-exist-map"
• Previous message: Jonathan V Hays: "RE: dlsw lite"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:58 GMT-3