RE: R&S MPLS

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jun 13 2003 - 03:52:17 GMT-3


And how many "typical" enterprise customers are running MPLS? Hell, how
many enterprise customers period are running it? A handful, which is
hard to see it as being a "core IP skill" in the typical environment.
For a service provider, or very large network, I think you are
definitely correct! For the R&S lab though...

I think there is enough other major topics to be concerned about and
test people on. MPLS is not a topic that you just throw a few points in
and see what you can do. It's something you either completely integrate
into the lab scenario or you don't.

While solely my opinion, I do not believe that MPLS will make it onto
the R&S Lab exam. It's busy enough in C&S lab.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Nawaz, Ajaz [mailto:Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:32 AM
To: 'Joe Martin'; Pratt, Jeremy; 'Scott Morris'; 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason
Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS

well if indeed MPLS is present in the written but NOT in the LAB, how
long can we realistically imagine before MPLS is tested within RS LAB
environment ? MPLS is regarded amongst many experts as core IP skill and
It is inevitable that it will be tested upon in RS(lab) sooner rather
than later.

ajaz

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Martin [mailto:jmartin@capitalpremium.net]
Sent: 12 June 2003 22:51
To: Pratt, Jeremy; 'Scott Morris'; 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS

Of course if you meant that MPLS was on your written, them please ignore
that last mail I sent.

Joe Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Pratt, Jeremy
Sent: June 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: 'Scott Morris'; 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS

It was on mine, got hammered on it. A good 10 questions that made my
head spin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:01 AM
To: 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS

If it's any consolation, MPLS is not on the R&S exam... I would suggest
picking up some of the Cisco Press books for general theory on MPLS.
Otherwise for the 20,000 foot view, MPLS is Frame Relay on steroids. :)
Same general (VERY general) concepts.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jason Cash
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:48 AM
To: 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS

Well, the idea being, that at some point everybody was a dummy before
they became an expert. I have absolutely no undetstanding of MPLS,
hence, I asked for links to learn about it. I can tell you this, even
Jimi Hendrix sucked the first time he picked up a guitar.

I interpret dumb as not being well-versed in a subject, whereas an idiot
would be incapable of learning. So I would rather be dumb than an idiot
any day of the week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Graun [mailto:jgraun@attbi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:30 PM
To: 'Jason Cash'; ccielab@groupstudy.com

MPLS and dummies should never be used on the same page, let alone the
same infrastructure. Why is there a notion in the IT field that anybody
including "dummies" can be an "expert" and make a lot of money? Just a
thought.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jason Cash
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:46 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: R&S MPLS

Can someone provide me with a few links to MPLS case studies and/or
examples for cisco networks. A "MPLS for dummies" would be nice.

-----------------------------------------------------------
SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message and any attachments are
intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are
addressed. This communication may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law
(e.g., personal health information, research data, financial
information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption,
individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the
information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without
the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying
to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from
your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive
further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and
inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from
the sender. ===========================================================

.

**********************************************************************
Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged.
It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it or use or disclose its
contents to anyone.
Thank you for your co-operation.
**********************************************************************



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:57 GMT-3