From: amilabs (amilabs@optonline.net)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 21:03:47 GMT-3
What are you talking about? What is so bad about saying he had mpls on the
written exam. It would be listed in the blueprint as an exam topic anyway.
It is not like he specifically outlined detailed mpls questions and answers
covered on his specific exam. All he said was I had mpls on my exam and 10
questions. big deal. get over it.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Peter van Oene
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:08 PM
To: Brent D. Stewart; Pratt, Jeremy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
This thread is about as blatant an NDA violation as I've seen in a couple
years on this list.. I'd end it.
At 03:57 PM 6/12/2003 -0400, Brent D. Stewart wrote:
>On your written or your lab? Thanks for clarifying.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pratt, Jeremy [mailto:JPratt@coh.org]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:23 PM
>To: 'Scott Morris'; 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>It was on mine, got hammered on it. A good 10 questions that made my
>head
>spin.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:01 AM
>To: 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>
>If it's any consolation, MPLS is not on the R&S exam... I would suggest
>picking up some of the Cisco Press books for general theory on MPLS.
>Otherwise for the 20,000 foot view, MPLS is Frame Relay on steroids. :)
>Same general (VERY general) concepts.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Jason Cash
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:48 AM
>To: 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>
>Well, the idea being, that at some point everybody was a dummy before
>they became an expert. I have absolutely no undetstanding of MPLS,
>hence, I asked for links to learn about it. I can tell you this, even
>Jimi Hendrix sucked the first time he picked up a guitar.
>
>I interpret dumb as not being well-versed in a subject, whereas an idiot
>would be incapable of learning. So I would rather be dumb than an idiot
>any day of the week.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Graun [mailto:jgraun@attbi.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:30 PM
>To: 'Jason Cash'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
>MPLS and dummies should never be used on the same page, let alone the
>same infrastructure. Why is there a notion in the IT field that anybody
>including "dummies" can be an "expert" and make a lot of money? Just a
>thought.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Jason Cash
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:46 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: R&S MPLS
>
>Can someone provide me with a few links to MPLS case studies and/or
>examples for cisco networks. A "MPLS for dummies" would be nice.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message and any attachments are
>intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are
>addressed. This communication may contain information that is
>privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law
>(e.g., personal health information, research data, financial
>information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption,
>individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the
>information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without
>the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended
>recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the
>message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
>copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the
>communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying
>to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from
>your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive
>further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and
>inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from
>the sender.
>===========================================================
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 6/10/2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:57 GMT-3