From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 19:07:49 GMT-3
This thread is about as blatant an NDA violation as I've seen in a couple
years on this list.. I'd end it.
At 03:57 PM 6/12/2003 -0400, Brent D. Stewart wrote:
>On your written or your lab? Thanks for clarifying.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pratt, Jeremy [mailto:JPratt@coh.org]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:23 PM
>To: 'Scott Morris'; 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>It was on mine, got hammered on it. A good 10 questions that made my
>head
>spin.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:01 AM
>To: 'Jason Cash'; 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>
>If it's any consolation, MPLS is not on the R&S exam... I would suggest
>picking up some of the Cisco Press books for general theory on MPLS.
>Otherwise for the 20,000 foot view, MPLS is Frame Relay on steroids. :)
>Same general (VERY general) concepts.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Jason Cash
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:48 AM
>To: 'Jason Graun'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: R&S MPLS
>
>
>Well, the idea being, that at some point everybody was a dummy before
>they became an expert. I have absolutely no undetstanding of MPLS,
>hence, I asked for links to learn about it. I can tell you this, even
>Jimi Hendrix sucked the first time he picked up a guitar.
>
>I interpret dumb as not being well-versed in a subject, whereas an idiot
>would be incapable of learning. So I would rather be dumb than an idiot
>any day of the week.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Graun [mailto:jgraun@attbi.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:30 PM
>To: 'Jason Cash'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
>MPLS and dummies should never be used on the same page, let alone the
>same infrastructure. Why is there a notion in the IT field that anybody
>including "dummies" can be an "expert" and make a lot of money? Just a
>thought.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Jason Cash
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:46 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: R&S MPLS
>
>Can someone provide me with a few links to MPLS case studies and/or
>examples for cisco networks. A "MPLS for dummies" would be nice.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message and any attachments are
>intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are
>addressed. This communication may contain information that is
>privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law
>(e.g., personal health information, research data, financial
>information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption,
>individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the
>information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without
>the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended
>recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the
>message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
>copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the
>communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying
>to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from
>your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive
>further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and
>inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from
>the sender.
>===========================================================
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 6/10/2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:57 GMT-3