From: chiragshroff (chiragshroff@myrealbox.com)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 08:53:51 GMT-3
you just see the example bellow.................its p-t-m network.
chiragshroff
----- Original Message -----
From: Jung, Jin <jin.jung@lmco.com>
To: 'chiragshroff' <chiragshroff@myrealbox.com>; 'Group'
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 04:51 PM
Subject: RE: frame-relay map
>
>
> What network type are you running?
> Point to multipoint, non-broadcast, broadcast ....
>
> And what protocol ospf, eigrp rip ....
>
> Jin jung...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chiragshroff [mailto:chiragshroff@myrealbox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:26 AM
> To: Brian Dennis; 'Jung, Jin'; 'Group'
> Subject: frame-relay map
>
>
> dear............. brian dennis,jung jin and group
>
> yes definately..............you just try this statement in this example
>
> R4
> int S0
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 201 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.5 201 ...........???
>
> R5
> int S0
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 301 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.4 301 ...........???
>
>
> we dont require broadcast key word on the next statement...........i have
> tested it......i think we dont need that keyword on spok to spok
> maping....???
>
> if i am wrong plz explain me.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian Dennis <brian@labforge.com>
> To: 'Jung, Jin' <jin.jung@lmco.com>; 'chiragshroff'
> <chiragshroff@myrealbox.com>; 'Group' <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 09:59 PM
> Subject: RE:
>
>
> > The broadcast has to be sent via the hub so do you think the hub will
> > forward the broadcast?
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Jung, Jin
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:31 AM
> > To: 'chiragshroff'; Group
> > Subject: RE:
> >
> > Yes,,
> > Without it your IGP will not work, like ospf and eigrp
> > Try it.
> >
> > Remember, you are working in NBMA network, non-broadcast multi access.
> >
> > Jin jung...
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: chiragshroff [mailto:chiragshroff@myrealbox.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:02 AM
> > To: Group
> > Subject:
> >
> >
> > thnx for your setisfactory answer .................but
> >
> > why we should give "broadcast" keywork after framerelay map statement
> > of spok to spok router maping...............is that necessary.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John Underhill <stepnwlf@magma.ca>
> > To: chiragshroff <chiragshroff@myrealbox.com>; Group
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 01:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: routing protocol over frame-relay
> >
> >
> > > If you are using point-to-multipoint as ospf type on hub and spokes,
> > > you
> > can
> > > use inverse arp, or create mappings between all nodes. Spokes are
> > > mapped
> > to
> > > each other using the hubs DLCI. In EIGRP, the same frame mappings
> > > will
> > work,
> > > so long as you have disabled split horizon on the hub, and use
> > > neighbor statements on hub and spokes..
> > >
> > > R2
> > > D 192.168.4.0/24 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.4, 00:00:10, Serial0.1
> > > D 192.168.5.0/24 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.5, 00:03:53, Serial0.1
> > > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0.1
> > > C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > 150.50.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> > > C 150.50.9.0 is directly connected, Dialer0
> > > C 150.50.17.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> > >
> > > interface Serial0.1 multipoint
> > > ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> > > no ip split-horizon eigrp 100
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.4 101 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.5 102 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > >
> > > router eigrp 100
> > > passive-interface default
> > > no passive-interface Serial0.1
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> > > network 192.168.2.0
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.5
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.4
> > > no auto-summary
> > > !
> > >
> > > R4
> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > >
> > > 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0
> > > C 192.168.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > D 192.168.5.0/24 [90/2809856] via 10.1.1.2, 00:01:07, Serial0
> > > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> > > D 192.168.2.0/24 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.2, 00:01:07, Serial0
> > >
> > > interface Serial0
> > > ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
> > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > logging event subif-link-status
> > > logging event dlci-status-change
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 201 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.5 201 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > >
> > > router eigrp 100
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> > > network 192.168.4.0
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.2
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.5
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > > R5
> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > >
> > > 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0
> > > D 192.168.4.0/24 [90/2809856] via 10.1.1.2, 00:01:18, Serial0
> > > C 192.168.5.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> > > D 192.168.2.0/24 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.2, 00:01:39, Serial0
> > > 150.50.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> > > C 150.50.9.0 is directly connected, Dialer0
> > > C 150.50.18.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> > >
> > > interface Serial0
> > > ip address 10.1.1.5 255.255.255.0
> > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > logging event subif-link-status
> > > logging event dlci-status-change
> > > no fair-queue
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 301 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.4 301 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > >
> > > router eigrp 100
> > > network 10.0.0.0
> > > network 192.168.5.0
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.4
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.2
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "chiragshroff" <chiragshroff@myrealbox.com>
> > > To: "Group" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:57 AM
> > > Subject: routing protocol over frame-relay
> > >
> > >
> > > > hello every body,
> > > >
> > > > in framrelay p-t-m network.on spok routers we r giving framerelay
> > > > map
> > > command
> > > > to map other spok router.if we dont ginve it and will give only
> > > > map to
> > hub
> > > it
> > > > will not work with eigrp while it will work with ospf
> > > > ...........as we
> > > will
> > > > give ip ospf net p-t-m command.
> > > >
> > > > is that a behaviour of ospf to work on fram relay point to
> > > > multipoing network then is there any command in eigrp or other
> > > > routing portocol to work on ........
> > > >
> > > > is that necessary in ccie lab that we have to up the basic p-t-m
> > > framerelay
> > > > whether it work with ospf or eigrp...........???
> > > >
> > > > have a nice day
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > chirag
> >
> > have a nice day
> > regards,
> >
> > chirag
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:55 GMT-3