From: Messina, John V (john@crimsoncti.com)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 21:04:38 GMT-3
the question calls for "E164 style" my understanding is, at least according to cisco, the use of wildcards is perfectly legal and does not require the full digit string to correctly address the requirements of this task.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/rel_docs/gktmp4_1/howgktmp.htm
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120xh/h323v2xh.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: badger [mailto:badger@pongo.org]
Sent: Wed 6/4/2003 5:10 PM
To: nobody@groupstudy.com; folivore
Cc: Messina, John V; CNLink Technical; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re[2]: VoIP dial-peer question
Hello folivore,
Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 8:26:33 PM, you wrote:
f> why 4 digits? Formal E.164 should be 15 digits including 3 digits country
f> code.
f> ----- Original Message -----
f> From: "Messina, John V" <john@crimsoncti.com>
f> To: "CNLink Technical" <tech_support@us.cnlink.net>;
f> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
f> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:55 PM
f> Subject: RE: VoIP dial-peer question
>> For obvious reasons I have never used T by itself but even if
f> that does work a more effecient method for the scenario you desribe would be
f> to use
>>
>> ....
>>
>> this will route the call as soon as it matches
>>
>> with T it will wait until the interdigit timeout which defaults to 10
f> seconds
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CNLink Technical [mailto:tech_support@us.cnlink.net]
>> Sent: Mon 6/2/2003 3:37 PM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Cc:
>> Subject: RE: VoIP dial-peer question
>>
>>
>>
>> Also
>>
>> +(Optional) Character indicating an E.164 standard number.
>>
>> Be sure to read this page completely
>>
f> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/vvfa
>> x_c/int_c/dpeer_c/dp_confg.htm
>>
>> JC Cham
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>> McCallum, Robert
>> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:51 AM
>> To: 'Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: RE: VoIP dial-peer question
>>
>>
>> T
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez [mailto:munarriz@satec.es]
>> > Sent: 02 June 2003 13:13
>> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: VoIP dial-peer question
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I4ve seen in a lab test training a problem with a router with
>> > two FXS ports and a VoIP dial-peer with extensisn 3002. The
>> > router must be configure to reach the extensisn 3002 without
>> > configuring a specified number. Beside this it asks for
>> > configure E164 style.
>> > Have you got any idea about such dial-peer configuration?.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> > ____________________________________________
>> >
>> > Juan Manuel Munarriz Gonzalez
>> > Dpto. Ingenieria de red
>> > email: munarriz@satec.es
>> >
>> > SATEC/CONVEX
>> > Avda. Europa 34 A
>> > 28023 Aravaca MADRID (SPAIN)
>> > Tlf.: +34 91 708 90 00 | +34 91 211 03 00
>> > Fax.: +34 91 708 90 90 | +34 91 211 03 90
>> > ____________________________________________
I'd like to know the answer to this one too. By the way, the country
code for the US is "1," Japan "81," so wouldn't the E.164 address be
11 digits for the US and 12 digits for Japan?
--
Best regards,
badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:52 GMT-3