From: Mhlanga Libone (libone.mhlanga@nhsia.nhs.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 04:39:47 GMT-3
Doh !!! It turns out the switch needed "ip route 0/0" rather than the "ip
default-gateway" command that I had used !!
I really cannot believe that !! so whats the "ip d/gway" command for then
???
-----Original Message-----
From: Larson, Chris [mailto:CLarson@usaid.gov]
Sent: 03 June 2003 20:02
To: Mhlanga Libone
Subject: RE: 4506 on 12.1(12c)EW - mgmt interface ??
I cannot offer any advice or anything except to say that about 2 weeks ago I
installed 5 4507R's and 2 6500 Core's and the Vlan chosen for manageing
switch devices was 192. I did not have to do anything special except to
configure an SVI on each switch and give it an IP in the proper subnet wih a
default route back to core. We did not have any ports in the 192 Vlan on the
4507 switches. We did have sc0 in the closets assigned to Vlan 192, but no
ports on the 4507(running native).
It sounds like the exact same config you have. Although, I do believe I
shutdown any Vlan 1 interfaces and cleared vlan 1 from all the trunks, or at
least only allowed vlan 2 - xxxx across the trunks. Don't know if this helps
at all, but I wanted to let you know it sounds like we did the same thing
without issue. If your Vlan 1 is up maybe trying shutting it, but I do not
think that should matter.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mhlanga Libone [SMTP:libone.mhlanga@nhsia.nhs.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:01 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: 4506 on 12.1(12c)EW - mgmt interface ??
>
> For the life of me I CANNOT find any way of configuring the mgmt interface
> on any vlan other than vlan 1.
>
> Documentation says you can put the management interface in any vlan as
> long
> as there are access ports in that vlan. So I tried putting it in vlan 17
> as
> I have 42 devices in that vlan ....then put a default route pointing to
> the
> msfc with trunking between the two....still no joy. Although I can reach
> the
> 4506 by first hoping onto the msfc but no access from anywhere else. The
> attached hosts are fine they can talk to anything ..its just the switch
> mgmt....why get rid of CatOS I ask ??
> This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
> distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on
> its
> contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
> inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you
> for your co-operation.
This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its
contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you
for your co-operation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:52 GMT-3