Re: EIGRP Practical Limitations

From: MADMAN (dave@interprise.com)
Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 11:26:14 GMT-3


   Obviously there is a practical limit though I don't believe there is
a hard network limit as there is for BGP. Resource use is not linear
and depends on the number of neighbors you have, the number of routes
and stability. Judicious use of aggregation will help if memory is an
issue.

   What do you consider "very large"?

   Dave

Brennan_Murphy@NAI.com wrote:
> router eigrp 1
> network 1.0.0.0
> network 2.0.0.0
> network 3.0.0.0
> network 4.0.0.0
> network N.0.0.0
>
> Is there a practical limitation to the number of networks an EIGRP
> process can handle on an Enterprise network? When I populate
> an EIGRP process with numerous networks, am I taxing the
> IOS memory in any special way? It seems like the taxing of
> resources would only arise if I created multiple EIGRP processes,
> correct? I'm building a *very* large lab network for special purposes
> research and was wondering about these issues.
>
> Anyone have any insights on this?
>
>

-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367

"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:50 GMT-3