From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 10:06:38 GMT-3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Re-act
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:55 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: A QOS question
>
>
> If anyone would help me?
>
> clients--(f0/0)R1(s0/0)---FR----(s0/0)R2(f1/0)----server
>
> when clients access web and ftp on server,they find the speed
> is very slow,and sometimes ftp would be disconnected,but on
> R1 the load was not full,pls give a solution.use PQ or WRED,or FRTS?
>
>
Unless the question supplied more information on CIR, access rates on
the interfaces, and so forth, I would eliminate FRTS as a solution
choice. Additionally, FRTS focuses more on link traffic rates and the
statement "on R1 the load was not full" implies this is not the problem.
Similarly, WRED is also aimed at traffic rate congestion problems
(congestion avoidance).
So my guess is Priority Queueing, if this is a multiple choice question.
If you have other options, take a look at Custom Queueing, WFQ, and
other congestion avoidance solutions.
Reading the Doc CD's "Quality of Service Overview" would probably help
you here because it will give you an overview of what each type of QOS
tool accomplishes.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
qos_c/qcdintro.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:46 GMT-3