RE: OSPF basic configuration problem

From: Ashok kumar Sinha (ashok.sinha@lycos.com)
Date: Tue May 20 2003 - 03:09:58 GMT-3


keyser ,
Plz check for sho ip ospf interface
sho ip ospf neigh
sho ip ospf neigh detail
and see whether dr bdr relationship and adjacency is forming or not
in case not check for other things like area authentication hello interval dead interval etc
ashok

--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:47:03 From: Tim Fletcher <tim@fletchmail.net> To: "Larson, Chris" <CLarson@usaid.gov>, "'Scott Morris'"<swm@emanon.com>,"'Jung, Jin'" <jin.jung@lmco.com>, "'keyser soze'"<soze39@hotmail.com>,ccielab@groupstudy.com Cc:

>Chris, > >Scott is correct. The OSPF number is only a process ID, and is only locally >significant. It's only real purpose is to allow you to run multiple >independent OSPF processes. In IGRP and EIGRP, it is an AS number, and must >match between neighbors. > >-Tim Fletcher #11406 > >At 11:43 AM 5/16/2003 -0400, Larson, Chris wrote: >>Are you sure about this? This has not been my experience and maybe I do not >>understand what you are trying to convey? >> >>If you have router ospf 1 on one router and router ospf 2 on another router, >>these routers will not exchange routing info. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 4:25 PM >>To: 'Jung, Jin'; 'keyser soze'; ccielab@groupstudy.com >>Subject: RE: OSPF basic configuration problem >> >> >>The process id is locally significant only, so it doesn't matter what number >>you pick, or whether they match or not. >> >>Scott >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >>Jung, Jin >>Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:48 PM >>To: 'keyser soze'; ccielab@groupstudy.com >>Subject: RE: OSPF basic configuration problem >> >> >>You have two different process running on each router, >> >>Router 1 ospf 1 >>Router 2 ospf 2 >> >>Try to run on same process, and see if it will work for you. >> >>Jin jung... >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: keyser soze [mailto:soze39@hotmail.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 3:29 AM >>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >>Subject: OSPF basic configuration problem >> >> >>Hi all. >> >>I've a problem configuring OSPF between two routers via ethernet. The sh ip >>route only shows directly connected networks. I'm pasting the running config >> >>below. Any help would be appreciated. >> >>---- R1 ----- >>hostname R1 >> >>interface Loopback0 >>ip address 131.108.4.1 255.255.255.128 >>! >>interface Loopback1 >>ip address 131.108.4.129 255.255.255.128 >>! >>interface Loopback2 >>ip address 131.108.5.1 255.255.255.224 >>! >>interface Ethernet0 >>ip address 131.108.1.1 255.255.255.0 >>! >>interface Serial0 >>no ip address >>shutdown >>no fair-queue >>! >>interface Serial1 >>no ip address >>shutdown >>! >>interface BRI0 >>no ip address >>shutdown >>! >>router ospf 1 >>log-adjacency-changes >>network 131.108.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 >>network 131.108.4.0 0.0.0.127 area 1 >>network 131.108.4.128 0.0.0.127 area 1 >>network 131.108.5.0 0.0.0.31 area 1 >>! >>ip classless >>ip http server >> >>---- R1 ----- >>hostname R2 >>! >>! >>! >>! >>! >>! >>ip subnet-zero >>! >>! >>! >>! >>! >>! >>interface Loopback0 >>ip address 131.108.5.3 255.255.255.224 >>! >>interface Loopback1 >>ip address 131.108.6.1 255.255.255.255 >>! >>interface Loopback2 >>ip address 131.108.6.2 255.255.255.255 >>! >>interface Ethernet0 >>ip address 131.108.1.2 255.255.255.0 >>! >>interface Serial0 >>no ip address >>shutdown >>no fair-queue >>! >>interface Serial1 >>no ip address >>shutdown >>! >> >>router ospf 2 >>log-adjacency-changes >>network 131.108.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 >>network 131.108.5.32 0.0.0.31 area 1 >>network 131.108.6.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 >>network 131.108.6.2 0.0.0.0 area 1 >>! >>ip classless >>ip http server >> >>Thanks. >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:45 GMT-3