From: Richard Danu (rdanu@apex3.com)
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 20:36:54 GMT-3
I think there might be a proctor who would check to see if you configured
step 1 first, although you will still filter out the route.
I would configure every step and every requirement, nothing more and noting
less. Although doing "less" will definitely get you in trouble, doing "more"
might get you in problem. -- Who knows?
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
GSRouting@dualccie.com
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 3:19 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Meeting all requirements
I haven't seen this one discussed before, so I'll toss it out there for
discussion. I believe I know the "correct" answer, but just wanted to see
what other people thought.
Here's an example.
11.11.11.11/24 ---- R1 ------------ R2 ---- 22.22.22.22/24
Step one has me configure OSPF between the two including their loopbacks.
R1's loopback 11.11.11.11 should not show up as /32 in R2's routing. (ip
ospf network point-to-point)
Step two asks me to filter the 11.11.11.x route inbound on R2.
Now doing step two successfully meets step one's requirement of no /32 route
in the routing table, but to get the points for both sections, would I need
to meet the requirements in step one first? I know it wouldn't hurt in this
instance, but I always try to keep my configs to a minimum.
The reason I ask is that I had assumed in the past that we were supposed to
look at the big picture, and if a requirement was met by a later task, then
it would be acceptable. Now I believe the opposite, and am curious what
other people feel about this.
-Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:44 GMT-3