Policy Based Routing

From: Daniel Free (danrose111@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 18:38:22 GMT-3

• Next message: Armand D: "Tunnel IPSec between PIX to PIX"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: OT - UDP1000 VPN on PIX 6.3.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

     Hi to all,
I know that with PBR anything not matching will be routed
normally. Here's my question. Check the following scenario
and tell me if a second route map statement is needed. I
don't think so because of the routed normally rule:
R2
interface Serial0.24 point-to-point
 ip address 150.50.24.2 255.255.255.0
 ip policy route-map voice
 frame-relay interface-dlci 204
!
access-list 101 permit ip any host 200.0.0.7 precedence 5
!
route-map voice permit 10
 match ip address 101
 set ip next-hop 150.50.100.5
!
route-map voice permit 20

Thanks very much for all opinions.
    Danny

• Next message: Armand D: "Tunnel IPSec between PIX to PIX"
• Previous message: Sam Munzani: "Re: OT - UDP1000 VPN on PIX 6.3.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:43 GMT-3