From: Fanglo MA (fangloma@pacific.net.hk)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 06:37:36 GMT-3
Dear Zsp,
Thank you for your reply. After the blocking from the question I then
realize the defintiion of redistribution and as you said below it is
caused by non-transit nature of redistribution. And by defintion it does
what it defined.
Thanks you.
Regards,
Fanglo
_____________________________________________
Little minds are interested in extraordinary;
great minds in the commonplace.
- Elbert Hubbard.
On Tue, 13 May 2003, zsp wrote:
> hi
> only the route that install into the routing table as ospf route will be redistributed . in the routing table the lo0 is connected . So it missing from BGP table in RTA.
>
> -----e e' i.d;6-----
> ed;6d::: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]d;#h!( Fanglo MA
> eif6i4: Sunday, May 11, 2003 20:39
> f6d;6d::: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> d8;i": lo0->OSPF->BGP, missing lo0 in BGP table??
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Simple setup,
>
> RTC-----|
> lo0----RTA-----RTF
>
> RTA run ospf area0 with RTF and redist all connected, lo0 with /32 mask.
> RTA also run iBGP and redist ospf match extern intern nssa.
> RTF can see the OSPF route of lo0 from RTA.
> RTA has no route about lo0 in its BGP table
>
> Why lo0 is missing from BGP table in RTA?
>
> TIA,
> Fanglo
> _____________________________________________
> Little minds are interested in extraordinary;
> great minds in the commonplace.
> - Elbert Hubbard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:41 GMT-3