From: Frank B (frank@buff-net.com)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 05:33:03 GMT-3
Krishnan,
I think the key here is that r2 & r3 only communicate via iBGP.
In order to get the eigrp routes into rip (and vice-versa) they have to
become iBGP routes shared between r2 & r3. Then the "bgp
redistribute-internal" command allows redistribution of those iBGP
routes into the rip & eigrp process(es) This is NOT the default
behavior.
Hope that helps, Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mark Thomas
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 1:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: 'Krishnan Narayanan'
Subject: RE: BGP redistribute-internal
Hello
I believe this to be the case
R1-----------R2-----------------R3------------R4
Rip Rip/BGP(AS32) BGP(AS32)/EIGRP Eigrp
If you don't use this command on one of the BGP routers R1 wont see R4
routes and visa versa
-----Original Message-----
From: Krishnan Narayanan [mailto:krishnan.narayanan@cwgoindia.com]
Sent: Monday, 12 May 2003 7:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP redistribute-internal
Can somebody refer me to a scenario where one is forced to use
"bgp redistribute-internal" ?
Kris.
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient,please notify the
sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person,
use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:41 GMT-3