Re: EIGRP confusion

From: lg01 (lg01@myway.com)
Date: Sun May 04 2003 - 20:18:56 GMT-3


Hi Jim,

Can you please elaborate a bit more?

Since if I take the network command out of EIGRP on R14, the EIGRP adjacency will break

Mar 1 00:32:57.512 UTC: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP 350: Neighbor 145.20.150.13
 (Serial0/1) is down: interface down

Thanks.

Best Regards,
H.

Hey Hunt,

I confess that that I'm not 100% sure of the answer I'm about to give you
but perhaps, the groupstudy community will confirm or debunk my theory. So,
here goes:

In a static route, if you point it at an interface, the router considers it
a directly connected network with an Admin Dist = 0; when the static points
to the next-hop-address, the router considers it a static route with an AD =
1.

Now, here's the part I'm not positive about, but I suspect that when the
router goes to advertise it's route entries, the static route entry is
considered reduntant because the interface is already covered by the network
command. To test this theory, try reconfiguring the router so that network
between rtr 13 and 14 isn't included in your network command. Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "lg01" <lg01@myway.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 10:52 PM
Subject: EIGRP confusion

> Hi Group,
>
> If I have:-
>
> R13 --- R14 --- R3
>
> All 3 routers are in EIGRP AS 350
>
> If I have a default static route at R14 that needs to be advertised out to
R13
>
> So at R14:
>
> router eigrp 350
> redistribute static
> network 145.20.143.0 0.0.0.255
> network 145.20.150.0 0.0.0.255
> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500
> no auto-summary
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/0
>
> And R13 can see the default route happy so far...
>
> r13#sh ip route
>
> Gateway of last resort is 145.20.150.14 to network 0.0.0.0
>
> 145.20.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
> D 145.20.143.0 [90/2681856] via 145.20.150.14, 01:59:09, Serial1
> C 145.20.150.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> C 145.20.13.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/2425856] via 145.20.150.14, 01:59:09, Serial1
> r13#
>
>
> However, as soon as I put "redistribute connected" on R14 as well, the
default route disappeared from R13's RT. Why?
>
> So if I do this on R14:-
>
> router eigrp 350
> redistribute connected
> redistribute static
> network 145.20.143.0 0.0.0.255
> network 145.20.150.0 0.0.0.255
> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500
> no auto-summary
>
> And at R13, the default route is gone...
>
> r13#sh ip route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 33.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 33.1.1.0 [170/297756416] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:21, Serial1
> 145.20.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
> D 145.20.143.0/24 [90/2681856] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:21, Serial1
> C 145.20.150.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1
> D EX 145.20.200.0/24 [170/2172416] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:21, Serial1
> C 145.20.13.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> D EX 145.20.14.0/24 [170/2297856] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:21, Serial1
> D EX 145.20.100.0/28 [170/2681856] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:22, Serial1
> 14.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 14.1.1.0 [170/2297856] via 145.20.150.14, 00:01:22, Serial1
> r13#
>
> And just for completeness, here is the config for R13:-
>
> router eigrp 350
> network 145.20.0.0
> no auto-summary
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Regards,
> Hunt



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:37 GMT-3