From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 20:13:15 GMT-3
Tony,
150.x.x.x is a class B network, so EIGRP will default to a /16, not a /8. So specifying 150.0.0.0 in your EIGRP config will not include 150.200.0.0.
-Tim Fletcher #11406
At 02:01 PM 4/26/03 -0700, Tony H. wrote:
>HI
>
>Eigrp across a Frame Relay cloud r2-r1. R2 has both
>ospf/eigrp and r1 is only eigrp
>
>r1:
>interface Serial0
> ip address 150.200.16.1 255.255.240.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip split-horizon
> frame-relay map ip 150.200.16.2 102 broadcast
>
>router eigrp 1
> network 150.200.0.0 (I did not use 150.0.0.0 because
>there were other interface under the 150.x.x.x
>subnets)
>
>R2
>interface Serial0.2 point-to-point
> ip address 150.200.16.2 255.255.240.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> frame-relay interface-dlci 201
>
>If I used on R1
>router eigrp 1
> network 150.0.0.0
>on a "deb ip packet" I would get
>02:46h:45: IP: s=150.200.16.2 (Serial0), d=224.0.0.10,
>len 60, unroutable
>
>If I used on R1
>router eigrp 1
> network 150.200.0.0
>Again, on "deb ip packet" I would get
>02:58:06: IP: s=150.200.16.2 (Serial0), d=224.0.0.10,
>len 60, rcvd 2
>
>With r2, I need to be specific in setting my "network"
>statement for both eigrp/ospf but I thought I did not
>need to do so for r1 as it only runs eigrp and assume
>I could use 150.0.0.0 but this cause packets to be
>"unroutable"...Just curious why? TIA
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
>http://search.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:08 GMT-3