From: Tom Larus (tlarus@cox.net)
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 14:52:44 GMT-3
In this article,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_con
figuration_guide_chapter09186a00800b75d2.html
Cisco puts the PPP config on a virtual-template and then applies that to an
interface, but I have seen it done in a production network using "interface
multilink 1" and then that is applied to the physical interface as
"multilink-group 1."
Is there any problem with not using the virtual-template method? Anyone
have any pros or cons of either method?
I guess this is a relatively new way to do this, and the Cisco docs and
articles often discuss the more established ways of doing things, but I
don't want to rely on a guess.
Tom Larus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:08 GMT-3