From: Oliver Ziltener (ziltener@netcloud.ch)
Date: Sat Apr 26 2003 - 07:58:22 GMT-3
Yes, it works fine when I add "area 51 range x.x.x.x y.y.y.y" on router R2.
thanks.
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Daniel Cisco Group Study [mailto:danielcgs@imc.net.au]
Gesendet: Samstag, 26. April 2003 01:35
An: Oliver Ziltener; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Betreff: RE: Unclear ospf behavor
You will need to summarise on R2 as well. R2 has a VL to Area0, so in effect,
it is an ABR to Area 0 as well.
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Ziltener [mailto:ziltener@netcloud.ch]
Sent: Saturday, 26 April 2003 05:04
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Unclear ospf behavor
Hello
Network Setup:
R6
|
R1--R2--------R5----R3
R2, R6, R5 are in Area 51, connected with ethernet, same subnet, R5 is an
ABR.
R3 is in Area0, Link between R5 and R3 is FR.
R1 is in area 2, R1 to R2 is HDLC link.
A Virtual Link from R2 to R5.
R6 has a few loopbacks, advertise this with ospf
R5 do summarization of this loopback networks. Goal: R3 should see only the
summary.
As long as I have no VL, the summarization works perfect, that mean R3 sees
only the summary route from the loopbacks.
But when I configure a VL between R2 and R5, then I get on R3 the summary
route AND all loopback routes!
Why this behavior?
thanks for any help
Oliver
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:07 GMT-3