From: aansar@sscomp.com.sg
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 22:47:36 GMT-3
can u pls post , the peering relationship between routers..!
"Wayne Hines"
<wayneh@DataNetD To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
ev.com.au> cc:
Sent by: Subject: BGP Design Guidelines
nobody@groupstud
y.com
25/04/2003 03:05
PM
Please respond
to "Wayne Hines"
Hello All,
I am under the belief that 'good' modern BGP AS design would have all
routers in an AS fully meshed with no synchronization, particularly for a
transit AS. (Note this is not referring to BGP with MPLS cores, where only
the PE routers would run BGP).
Given the following network, I would have run bgp on R1, R3, R7, however
testing has shown that only running BGP on R3, R7 is required to achieve
full connectivity. Would anyone like to comment on the pros & cons of
running BGP on R3, R7 versus R1, R3, R7?
R1, R3, R7 share a subnet and have an IGP running on them.
spoke---hub---spoke
R5----------R1-------R3-------R7-------R4
(AS 5) ( AS2001 ) (AS4)
Wayne Hines
B.Sc., M.Sc., CMACS Proj. Man., CSS1, CCDP+Net. Man.+Voice+ATM, CCNP, CNE,
MCNE, MCSE
Database & Network Developers - your Cisco Premier Partner / Novell
Business
Partner
Mailing: P.O. Box 14283 Melbourne 8001
Email: wayneh@DataNetDev.com.au
Web: http://www.DataNetDev.com.au/
Tel: +61 (0)3 9329 6444
Mobile: +61 (0)41 152 4486
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:07 GMT-3