From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 00:44:27 GMT-3
This is how it should be!
router ospf 1000
area 0 authentication message-digest
area 6 authentication
area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x message-digest-- and the key offcourse.
cheers,
sumit.
>From: <B3U$/ <johnson_liu@corp.giga.net.tw>
>Reply-To: <B3U$/ <johnson_liu@corp.giga.net.tw>
>To: "Daniel Free" <danrose111@earthlink.net>, "Teck PhrEAk!!"
><phreakinphunk@hotmail.com>, <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>,
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ospf question
>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:44:35 +0800
>
>Another question:
> If Area 0 use md5 authentication, Area 6(only used in Virtual-link) use
>plain text authentication, how should I config under router ospf process
>which of these solution are accepted ?
>
>router ospf 1000
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x authentication
>
>Or
>
>router ospf 1000
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x message-digest
>
>Or
>
>router ospf 1000
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 6 authentication
> area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x
>
>Or
>
>router ospf 1000
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 6 authentication
> area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x message-digest
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Free [mailto:danrose111@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 3:38 PM
> > To: Teck PhrEAk!!; Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: ospf question
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > Sorry to have to disagree but you need to configure the
> > password on the virtual link in your sample scenario. Check
> > ip ospf virtual and see if the adjacency is full. Probably
> > not. Check the below link. Thanks. Best of luck.
> > Danny
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/27.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Teck PhrEAk!!" <phreakinphunk@hotmail.com>
> > To: <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 2:24 AM
> > Subject: Re: ospf question
> >
> >
> > > Hi Danny,
> > >
> > > Yes, creating a virtual-link is like extending the boundary of area
> > > 0.....the implementation of a virtual-link requires area 0
> > > authentication
> > on
> > > the other side of the virtual-link , the one which does not
> > have any
> > > interfaces in area 0.
> > >
> > > also b'coz you are creating a virtual-link......and no actual
> > > interfaces
> > are
> > > involved in creating a virtual-link you dont require interface
> > > authentication.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > sumit.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
> > > >Reply-To: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
> > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: ospf question
> > > >Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:44:13 -0400
> > > >
> > > >router ospf 1000
> > > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > > area 0 authentication message-digest
> > > > area 6 virtual-link x.x.x.x
> > > > network x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 area 6
> > > > network x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 area 10
> > > >
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >This router has a virtual link to area 0 through area 6.
> > Area 0 is
> > > >doing authentication. I could not get the routes on the
> > this router
> > > >into the rest of the ospf network unless I added the "area 0
> > > >authentication message-digest" on this router. This is
> > very strange
> > > >since this router does
> > > >not have any interfaces in area 0. Unless the virtual
> > link is like an
> > > >interface in Area 0. Also, I did not have to add the
> > password anywhere
> > on
> > > >the router. Strange. It's almost like half authentication. Can
> > > >someone explain this?
> > > >
> > > >TIA,
> > > >Danny
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:06 GMT-3