RE: IPSec confusion

From: Hunt Lee (huntl@webcentral.com.au)
Date: Tue Apr 22 2003 - 20:24:49 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "Please ignore previous post re: Eigrp misbehaving"
• Previous message: Ian Stong: "OT: tool or utility needed to test the logic in ACL's"
• Maybe in reply to: lg01: "IPSec confusion"
• Next in thread: Rodia Rascall: "RE: IPSec confusion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sorry, I still don't understand.

Can you please explain a bit more?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodia Rascall [mailto:polarccie@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2003 7:21 AM
To: lg01@myway.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re:IPSec confusion

that depends
whether you route the traffic between 192.168.6.0 and
192.168.13.0 via tunnel or the routing protocol
already running...
if you choose the tunnel you should permit gre,
otherwise permitting ip will suffice...

Best Regards...

• Next message: ccie2be: "Please ignore previous post re: Eigrp misbehaving"
• Previous message: Ian Stong: "OT: tool or utility needed to test the logic in ACL's"
• Maybe in reply to: lg01: "IPSec confusion"
• Next in thread: Rodia Rascall: "RE: IPSec confusion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:36:02 GMT-3