From: Brian McGahan (brian@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 23:48:33 GMT-3
Mike,
"Show traffic-shape" to see what values are being applied to
which VC's.
HTH
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
Toll Free: 866.CyscoXP
Fax: 847.674.2625
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Michael L. Williams
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 8:23 PM
> To: CCIELab@Groupstudy.com
> Subject: FRTS Per Interface/Subinterface
>
> With all this talk about FRTS I have even more questions.
>
> Since it's possible to apply a FRTS map-class to a physical interface
> AND a subinterface (as seen below), can someone tell me if I
understand
> this or help clarify the following:
>
> interface Serial0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay class int_ts
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> !
> interface Serial0.24 point-to-point
> ip address 150.50.24.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay class subint-ts
> frame-relay interface-dlci 104
> !
> interface Serial0.256 multipoint
> ip address 150.50.100.2 255.255.255.224
> frame-relay map ip 150.50.100.2 105
> frame-relay map ip 150.50.100.5 105 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 150.50.100.6 106 broadcast
>
>
> If you apply the map-class to the physical interface (from the
> information I have) it applies it to all subinterfaces (but the
example
> I have doesn't apply any map-class to the sub-interfaces.
>
> Question: If you apply a map-class to the physical interface AND then
> to a subinterface, does the map-class on the subinterface override the
> map-class on the interface for that subinterface?
>
> i.e. in the config above would the 'int_ts' apply to serial0.256
(since
> there isn't a map-class applied to the subinterface) but at the same
> time would subint-ts apply to serial 0.24
>
> Does this make any sense, or would applying FRTS in this manner not
> work?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike W.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:58 GMT-3