DLSW QoS

From: Chris Goundry (chris@goundry.net)
Date: Thu Apr 17 2003 - 17:41:08 GMT-3

Next message: jim.phillipo@guardent.com: "OT:2600 Term Server connected to Nokia IP 440"
Previous message: Brian McGahan: "RE: FRTS Revealed (was RE: MINCIR = CIR?)"
Next in thread: folivore: "Re: DLSW QoS"
Maybe reply: folivore: "Re: DLSW QoS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

When using DLSW and TCP based peers, is the correct queuing method to
use the TCP port.

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 1981 (if priority enable on remote
peer)

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 1982 (if priority enable on remote
peer)

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 1983 (if priority enable on remote
peer)

.or the protocol.

priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high

Next message: jim.phillipo@guardent.com: "OT:2600 Term Server connected to Nokia IP 440"
Previous message: Brian McGahan: "RE: FRTS Revealed (was RE: MINCIR = CIR?)"
Next in thread: folivore: "Re: DLSW QoS"
Maybe reply: folivore: "Re: DLSW QoS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:56 GMT-3