From: cannonr (cannonr@attbi.com)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 17:29:03 GMT-3
I personally think it is a "BIG" mistake to tag or filter routes when there
is only one distribution point. It increases the possibility of making
mistakes. It just plain makes it more complex. Now the proctor has to read
through your route-maps to see what you are doing..... Wonder if he'll be
frustrated. Just keep in mind that this exam tests your ability to
successfully implement various tasks. It's not a design test. If you
achieve a certain goal, you get points for it. Just keep it simple......
That's my opinion.
Royce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Yee" <robert@bluespud.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 10:50 PM
Subject: FW: Redistribution: Filter of not to filter
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just wanted to get your opinion as to whether or not you prefer to
route filter on single point of redistribution when redistributing both
ways? Especially, if there is no requirement to deny/permit a specific
route.
> >
> > R2
> > /\
> > / \ OSPF
> > / \
> > ==R5====R6=== Filter? - YES!
> > _|____|_
> > | EIGRP
> > |
> > =====R7====== Filter? - NO?
> > |
> > | RIP v2
> > R8
> >
> > I can understand controlling the routes when there are 2 points of
redistribution, but on a single point, it would seem like a lot of work for
no reason if you didn't have to.
> >
> > Just wondering?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:53 GMT-3