From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 16:06:40 GMT-3
Thanks, Jake. After posting I did some checking around and found that the
byte-count is arbitrarily chosen, like you said. Wouldn't 5k be a bit big
though? You don't want app's timing out in lower queues because they have
to wait for the router to service the other queues right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jake Reynolds [mailto:JREYNOLDS@uscentral.org]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Danny Andaluz; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Custom Queueing
From what I understand the byte count is arbitrarily chosen to a point
unless explicitly defined. If the scenario doesn't define byte counts then I
just use 10K as my byte count and base everything off of that. So using 10K
50% would be 5K and so on. You don't want to use too big of a byte count of
course because bandwidth distribution will get jerky. Also, too small of a
byte count will byte you as well. Just understand how to figure proper byte
counts to match bandwidth percentages when they are given. This formula has
been discussed at length on the list and can be found easily in the
archives.
Jake Reynolds
Systems Engineer - Information Systems
CCIE #11224, MCSE NT4 & W2K, CCNA, CCNP, A+
US Central Credit Union
9701 Renner Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
Office- 913.227.6122
Cell- 816.305.6785
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Andaluz [mailto:dannyandaluz@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 11:10 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Custom Queueing
I have seen countless definitions on what it does, how it works,
etc... What I don't understand is how the byte-count for the queues is
derived. I have seen examples say to give 25% to this protocol in this
queue or 50% to this protocol in that queue. 25% of what??? I was
under the impression that the bandwidth configured on the interface is
what gets carved up. I saw one example that had two queues getting 50%
of the bandwidth each. The byte-count was set to 1000 on each. This
means that the total is 2000, but where does the 2000 come from??
Thanks,
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:52 GMT-3