From: Scott M. Livingston (scottl@sprinthosting.net)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:14:36 GMT-3
I believe you need to remove the remote peer that is currently setup and
then add back in the remote peer w/ the 'pass-thru' option.
r4(config)# no dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 401
r4(config)# dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 401
pass-thru
thanks,
scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Robert Yee
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:40 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Direct Encapsulation problem
I am attempting to condigure direct encap on frame relay between 2
rotuers.
The Cisco documentation states that 'pass-thru' should be added to the
dlsw remote statement.
However, when I try to add it I get the following error:
r4(config)#dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 401
pass-thru
%error: peers with same ipaddr & different transport types
I've tried it on either end of the connection and have had the same
error.
Here are the pertinent parts of the configs:
(R4)
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.4.4
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 401
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 150.50.4.4 255.255.255.255
!
interface Serial0
ip address 150.50.111.4 255.255.255.248
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map dlsw 401 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 150.50.111.2 401 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
(R2)
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.2.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 104
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 150.50.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
interface Serial0
ip address 150.50.111.2 255.255.255.248
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 150.50.111.4 104 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
TIA,
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:45 GMT-3