From: Ciscolab (ciscolab@vip.sina.com)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2003 - 10:58:42 GMT-3
Tria_ka,
Do the both need to follow the 75% rule and reserve 25% for routing and controll.
Regards,
Wang Yan
======= 2003-03-30 12:23:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>Yes there is.
>bandwith without percent means kb/s
>and
>bandwidth percent ....
>
>udo
>
>> Is there any different between "bandwidth" and " bandwidth percent", I
>> am confuse it,
>>
>>
>>
>> ======= 2003-03-30 07:57:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>>
>> >maybe there is a mistake .
>> >
>> >so what about the class DNS ?
>> >my solution is:
>> >
>> >1500(defaultvalue) / 11500 *128 = 16.7 * 0.75 = 2.5
>> >
>> >==> is this the value that i nee for
>> >class DNS
>> > bandwidth 12.5 and not 16 !!???
>> > queue-limit 100
>> >
>> >
>> >th anks to all
>> >
>> >udo
>> >
>> >
>> >> ======= 2003-03-27 13:21:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Scott,
>> >> >
>> >> >If I may, I wouldn't allocate 100 of the bandwidth to the classes
>> and
>> >> >would keep the default to 75 . If you want to assign more than 75 to
>> >> >the classes, that's fine but not up to 100.
>> >> >
>> >> >In other words, I'd rather use this formula for queue #1:
>> >> >128 kbps * (1000/11500) * 0.75 = 8 (bandwidth 8)
>> >> >In percentage, this gives us:
>> >> >(1000/11500) * 0.75 = 6.5 (bandwidth percent 6)
>> >> >
>> >> >May be I am missing something here so any input?
>> >> >
>> >> >Fabrice
>> >> >http://www.6colabs.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> >Scott M. Livingston
>> >> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:01 PM
>> >> >To: 'Abdul Waheed Ghaffar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> >Subject: RE: QOS
>> >> >
>> >> >Here is my attempt. For these scenarios if I can spot the bandwidth
>> >> >percent real quick then I just use the 'bandwidth percent' command.
>> In
>> >> >my own freakish way of thinking I can convert it quicker using the
>> >> >formula below. Tell me what you all think and please let me know if
>> I
>> >> >messed up somewhere.
>> >> >
>> >> >BW of Link in kbps * (byte count / total byte count) = BW
>> >> >
>> >> >For example:
>> >> >
>> >> >Queue #1
>> >> >---------
>> >> >128 kbps * (1000 / 11500) = 11
>> >> >
>> >> >!
>> >> >class-map match-all TELNET
>> >> > match protocol telnet
>> >> >class-map match-all DLSW
>> >> > match protocol dlsw
>> >> >class-map match-all FTP
>> >> > match protocol ftp
>> >> >class-map match-all DNS
>> >> > match protocol dns
>> >> >!
>> >> >policy-map MORE-FUN
>> >> > class TELNET
>> >> > bandwidth 11
>> >> > queue-limit 100
>> >> > class DNS
>> >> > bandwidth 16
>> >> > queue-limit 100
>> >> > class FTP
>> >> > bandwidth 33
>> >> > queue-limit 20
>> >> > class DLSW
>> >> > bandwidth 55
>> >> > queue-limit 20
>> >> > class class-default
>> >> > bandwidth 11
>> >> > queue-limit 20
>> >> >!
>> >> >
>> >> >thank you,
>> >> >scott
>> >> >
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> >Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
>> >> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:04 AM
>> >> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> >Subject: QOS
>> >> >
>> >> >Hi group,
>> >> >
>> >> >I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
>> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
>> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
>> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
>> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
>> >> ># queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
>> >> ># interface serial 0/1
>> >> ># custom-queue-list 1
>> >> >
>> >> >can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay
>> encapsulated
>> >> >
>> >> >....will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
>> >> >frame-relay?
>> >> >
>> >> >thanks in advance
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >_________________________________________________________________
>> >> >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
>> >> >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>> >>
>> >> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
>> >> @q#!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
>> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
>> >>
>> >
>> >--
>> >+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
>> >Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
>>
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>
>>
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
>> @q#!
>>
>>
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
>>
>
>--
>+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
>Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
@q#!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:44 GMT-3