From: Jeongwoo Park (jpark@wams.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 00:51:21 GMT-3
This allows only 172.16.32.0 - 172.16.47.255
jP
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:nigel_taylor@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 7:53 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ACL Test
All,
Ok, I'll bite..! How about this..
access-list 1 permit 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mahmud, Yasser" <YMahmud@Solutions.UK.ATT.com>
To: "'Voss, David'" <dvoss@heidrick.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 6:06 AM
Subject: RE: ACL Test
> Your solution no. 2 is wrong as the wildcard mask has 0 for the bit
> with weight of 8 so you will be missing the networks that need weight
> 8 e.g 172.16.40.0
>
> Yasser
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Voss, David [mailto:dvoss@heidrick.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:13 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: ACL Test
>
>
> Allow from 172.16.32.0 to 172.16.247.255 in least amount of lines.
>
> Solution #1:
>
> access-list 1 deny 172.16.0.0 0.0.31.255
> access-list 1 deny 172.16.248.0 0.0.7.255
> access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
>
> Solution #2:
>
> access-list 1 permit 172.16.32.0 0.0.215.255
>
> Which one would you choose?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:46 GMT-3