From: Frank Maisano (FrankM@netarch.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:25:59 GMT-3
So if we were to use the 'bandwidth' statement without percent, the answer
should look like this:
class-map TELNET
match protocol TELNET
class-map DNS
match protocol DNS
class-map FTP
match protocol FTP
class-map DLSW
match protocol DLSW
Policy-map CBWFQ
class TELNET
bandwidth 8
queue-limit 100
class DNS
queue-limit 100
class FTP
bandwidth 24
class DLSW
bandwidth 40
class class-default
bandwidth 8
This is based on converting the bytes to bits and then dividing by 1000 for
kbps.
Telnet = 1000 bytes
(1000*8/1000 = 8)
DLSW = 5000 bytes
(5000*8/1000 = 40)
...and so on. Do you agree with this configuration?
-FM
-----Original Message-----
From: tria_ka@gmx.net [mailto:tria_ka@gmx.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Brian Dennis
Cc: ciscolab@vip.sina.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Re: RE: QOS
Yes there is.
bandwith without percent means kb/s
and
bandwidth percent ....
udo
> Is there any different between "bandwidth" and " bandwidth percent", I
> am confuse it,
>
>
>
> ======= 2003-03-30 07:57:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>
> >maybe there is a mistake .
> >
> >so what about the class DNS ?
> >my solution is:
> >
> >1500(defaultvalue) / 11500 *128 = 16.7 * 0.75 = 2.5
> >
> >==> is this the value that i nee for
> >class DNS
> > bandwidth 12.5 and not 16 !!???
> > queue-limit 100
> >
> >
> >th anks to all
> >
> >udo
> >
> >
> >> ======= 2003-03-27 13:21:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
> >>
> >> >Hi Scott,
> >> >
> >> >If I may, I wouldn't allocate 100 of the bandwidth to the classes
> and
> >> >would keep the default to 75 . If you want to assign more than 75 to
> >> >the classes, that's fine but not up to 100.
> >> >
> >> >In other words, I'd rather use this formula for queue #1:
> >> >128 kbps * (1000/11500) * 0.75 = 8 (bandwidth 8)
> >> >In percentage, this gives us:
> >> >(1000/11500) * 0.75 = 6.5 (bandwidth percent 6)
> >> >
> >> >May be I am missing something here so any input?
> >> >
> >> >Fabrice
> >> >http://www.6colabs.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> >> >Scott M. Livingston
> >> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:01 PM
> >> >To: 'Abdul Waheed Ghaffar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> >Subject: RE: QOS
> >> >
> >> >Here is my attempt. For these scenarios if I can spot the bandwidth
> >> >percent real quick then I just use the 'bandwidth percent' command.
> In
> >> >my own freakish way of thinking I can convert it quicker using the
> >> >formula below. Tell me what you all think and please let me know if
> I
> >> >messed up somewhere.
> >> >
> >> >BW of Link in kbps * (byte count / total byte count) = BW
> >> >
> >> >For example:
> >> >
> >> >Queue #1
> >> >---------
> >> >128 kbps * (1000 / 11500) = 11
> >> >
> >> >!
> >> >class-map match-all TELNET
> >> > match protocol telnet
> >> >class-map match-all DLSW
> >> > match protocol dlsw
> >> >class-map match-all FTP
> >> > match protocol ftp
> >> >class-map match-all DNS
> >> > match protocol dns
> >> >!
> >> >policy-map MORE-FUN
> >> > class TELNET
> >> > bandwidth 11
> >> > queue-limit 100
> >> > class DNS
> >> > bandwidth 16
> >> > queue-limit 100
> >> > class FTP
> >> > bandwidth 33
> >> > queue-limit 20
> >> > class DLSW
> >> > bandwidth 55
> >> > queue-limit 20
> >> > class class-default
> >> > bandwidth 11
> >> > queue-limit 20
> >> >!
> >> >
> >> >thank you,
> >> >scott
> >> >
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> >> >Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
> >> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:04 AM
> >> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> >Subject: QOS
> >> >
> >> >Hi group,
> >> >
> >> >I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
> >> ># queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
> >> ># queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
> >> ># interface serial 0/1
> >> ># custom-queue-list 1
> >> >
> >> >can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay
> encapsulated
> >> >
> >> >....will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
> >> >frame-relay?
> >> >
> >> >thanks in advance
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >_________________________________________________________________
> >> >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> >> >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >>
> >> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> >>
> >>
> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
> >> @q#!
> >>
> >>
> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
> >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
> >>
> >
> >--
> >+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
> >Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
>
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
> @q#!
>
>
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
>
-- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:46 GMT-3