From: Brian Dennis (brian@labforge.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:23:34 GMT-3
If you are confused look it up on the Doc CD ;-)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
qos_r/qrdcmd1.htm#1029500
<Quote>
bandwidth (policy-map class)
To specify or modify the bandwidth allocated for a class belonging to a
policy map, use the bandwidth policy-map class configuration command. To
remove the bandwidth specified for a class, use the no form of this
command.
bandwidth {bandwidth-kbps | percent percent}
no bandwidth {bandwidth-kbps | percent percent}
Syntax Description
bandwidth-kbps
Amount of bandwidth (in kbps) to be assigned to the class.
percent percent
Percentage of available bandwidth to be assigned to the class.
</Quote>
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
Director of CCIE Training and Development - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: brian@ipexpert.net
Toll Free: 866.225.8064
Outside U.S. & Canada: 312.321.6924
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ciscolab
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:26 PM
To: tria_ka@gmx.net
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Re: RE: QOS
Is there any different between "bandwidth" and " bandwidth percent", I
am confuse it,
======= 2003-03-30 07:57:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>maybe there is a mistake .
>
>so what about the class DNS ?
>my solution is:
>
>1500(defaultvalue) / 11500 *128 = 16.7 * 0.75 = 2.5
>
>==> is this the value that i nee for
>class DNS
> bandwidth 12.5 and not 16 !!???
> queue-limit 100
>
>
>th anks to all
>
>udo
>
>
>> ======= 2003-03-27 13:21:00 DzTZ@4PEVPP45@#:=======
>>
>> >Hi Scott,
>> >
>> >If I may, I wouldn't allocate 100 of the bandwidth to the classes
and
>> >would keep the default to 75 . If you want to assign more than 75 to
>> >the classes, that's fine but not up to 100.
>> >
>> >In other words, I'd rather use this formula for queue #1:
>> >128 kbps * (1000/11500) * 0.75 = 8 (bandwidth 8)
>> >In percentage, this gives us:
>> >(1000/11500) * 0.75 = 6.5 (bandwidth percent 6)
>> >
>> >May be I am missing something here so any input?
>> >
>> >Fabrice
>> >http://www.6colabs.com
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
>> >Scott M. Livingston
>> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:01 PM
>> >To: 'Abdul Waheed Ghaffar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Subject: RE: QOS
>> >
>> >Here is my attempt. For these scenarios if I can spot the bandwidth
>> >percent real quick then I just use the 'bandwidth percent' command.
In
>> >my own freakish way of thinking I can convert it quicker using the
>> >formula below. Tell me what you all think and please let me know if
I
>> >messed up somewhere.
>> >
>> >BW of Link in kbps * (byte count / total byte count) = BW
>> >
>> >For example:
>> >
>> >Queue #1
>> >---------
>> >128 kbps * (1000 / 11500) = 11
>> >
>> >!
>> >class-map match-all TELNET
>> > match protocol telnet
>> >class-map match-all DLSW
>> > match protocol dlsw
>> >class-map match-all FTP
>> > match protocol ftp
>> >class-map match-all DNS
>> > match protocol dns
>> >!
>> >policy-map MORE-FUN
>> > class TELNET
>> > bandwidth 11
>> > queue-limit 100
>> > class DNS
>> > bandwidth 16
>> > queue-limit 100
>> > class FTP
>> > bandwidth 33
>> > queue-limit 20
>> > class DLSW
>> > bandwidth 55
>> > queue-limit 20
>> > class class-default
>> > bandwidth 11
>> > queue-limit 20
>> >!
>> >
>> >thank you,
>> >scott
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
>> >Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
>> >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:04 AM
>> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Subject: QOS
>> >
>> >Hi group,
>> >
>> >I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
>> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
>> ># queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
>> ># queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
>> ># queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
>> ># queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
>> ># interface serial 0/1
>> ># custom-queue-list 1
>> >
>> >can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay
encapsulated
>> >
>> >....will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
>> >frame-relay?
>> >
>> >thanks in advance
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_________________________________________________________________
>> >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
>> >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>>
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>
>>
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
>> @q#!
>>
>>
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
>>
>
>--
>+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
>Bitte ldcheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VB
@q#!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ciscolab
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ciscolab@vip.sina.com
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2003-03-30
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:46 GMT-3