From: ccie1@hotmail.com
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 00:56:49 GMT-3
My assumption would be so your not allowing OSPF to broadcast or send
updates to a interface that is not connected to another router.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Schaffran" <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>
To: "Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Make loopbacks passive
> I am just curious, why would you need or want to make a loopback passive?
>
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> "Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nawaz, Ajaz" <Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:56 AM
> Subject: OT: Make loopbacks passive
>
>
> > Does anyone know if Cisco have documented the best practice of making
> > loopbacks passive when running ospf (or other routing protocol) for
> example
> > ? e.g.
> >
> > router ospf 100
> > passive interface loopback 0
> >
> > ajaz
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged.
> > It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error,
> > please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
> > You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it or use or disclose its
> > contents to anyone.
> > Thank you for your co-operation.
> > **********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:46 GMT-3