From: Justin M. Ramsey (jramsey@mfaoil.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:42:30 GMT-3
I was under the impression that "no frame-relay inverse-arp" command was
to keep the dlci maps from being dynamically assigned, rather then
matching them with an IP. I must be wrong here?
Justin Ramsey
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan V Hays [mailto:jhays@jtan.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:30 AM
To: Justin M. Ramsey; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Frame-relay / IP assistance
Hi Justin,
Your problem is that you configured "no frame-relay inverse-arp" and
also have the subinterfaces configured with dynamic mapping
("frame-relay interface-dlci") which REQUIRES Inverse Arp to function.
You should only enter "no frame-relay inverse-arp" when you are
configuring a static map on the interface ("frame-relay map ip").
HTH
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Justin M. Ramsey
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:06 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Frame-relay / IP assistance
>
<snip>
> R1:
> interface Serial0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> interface Serial0.16 point-to-point
> ip address 10.10.16.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 16
> bridge-group 1
>
>
> R3:
> interface Serial0
> bandwidth 64
> no ip address
> ip directed-broadcast
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> logging event subif-link-status
> logging event dlci-status-change
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> interface Serial0.16 point-to-point
> bandwidth 56
> ip address 10.10.16.2 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> frame-relay interface-dlci 16
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:46 GMT-3