From: gary lileikis (lileikis@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 17:36:57 GMT-3
Said,
In considering the bandwidth calculation I think you
forgot to take into account the UDP domain. My
understanding is if you do not specify a byte count,
then the default is 1500. This would equate to a total
byte count of 11500.
Cheers...Gary
--- FATHALLAH <sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma> wrote:
> The CQ and CBWFQ are diffrent omplementation of
> bandwith reservation, it is
> not possible to apply the two technique to the same
> interface.if you don't
> have precision of the technologie to use in the LAB,
> it is mach easy to use
> CBWFQ. but be carefull the two technologie have
> diffrentes way of bandwith
> calculation.CQ calculation take into account the
> packet size.
> I think "gary lileikis" give the good config, but
> without the correct
> bandwith percent.
> the total bandwith reserved in your byte count is
> 10000 bytes, so FTP wil
> get 30%, dlsw 50%,telnet 10% and default 10%. and
> you don't need to reseve
> more maximum bandwith than default ( 75%).
>
> Good luck.
>
> Said FATHALLAH
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
> Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
> Envoyi : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:04
> @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Objet : QOS
>
>
> Hi group,
>
> I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
> # queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000
> limit 100
> # queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
> # queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
> # queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
> # queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
> # interface serial 0/1
> # custom-queue-list 1
>
> can any body giude me...the serial interface is
> frame-relay encapsulated
> ...will i map the service on physical interface or
> under class-map
> frame-relay?
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:43 GMT-3