From: FATHALLAH (sfathallah@mail.cbi.net.ma)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 16:15:36 GMT-3
The CQ and CBWFQ are diffrent omplementation of bandwith reservation, it is
not possible to apply the two technique to the same interface.if you don't
have precision of the technologie to use in the LAB, it is mach easy to use
CBWFQ. but be carefull the two technologie have diffrentes way of bandwith
calculation.CQ calculation take into account the packet size.
I think "gary lileikis" give the good config, but without the correct
bandwith percent.
the total bandwith reserved in your byte count is 10000 bytes, so FTP wil
get 30%, dlsw 50%,telnet 10% and default 10%. and you don't need to reseve
more maximum bandwith than default ( 75%).
Good luck.
Said FATHALLAH
-----Message d'origine-----
De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
Envoyi : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:04
@ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
Objet : QOS
Hi group,
I need to convert following CQ into CBWFQ
# queue-list 1 protocol tcp 1 telnet byte-count 1000 limit 100
# queue-list 1 protocol udp 2 domain limit 100
# queue-list 1 protocol tcp 3 ftp byte-count 3000
# queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 4 byte-count 5000
# queue-list 1 default 16 byte-count 1000
# interface serial 0/1
# custom-queue-list 1
can any body giude me...the serial interface is frame-relay encapsulated
...will i map the service on physical interface or under class-map
frame-relay?
thanks in advance
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:43 GMT-3