From: Hunt Lee (huntl@webcentral.com.au)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:41:19 GMT-3
Hey Michael,
I think on the target router, it is determined by the "port 1/0/0" command
under the dial-peer pots statement.
e.g. at remote router
dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 1111
port 1/0/0
dial-peer voice 2 ports
destination-parttern 2222
port 1/0/1
So when you ring this remote router by 1111, port 1/0/0 will answer. And
when you ring 2222, port 1/0/1 will answer.
Does this answer your question?
Regards,
Hunt
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 9:13 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Do dial peers have only local significance or not?
Been doing a bit of VOIP, and have question that keeps coming up in my
mind.
It has to do with the session target command which points to an ip
address.
How does the target of the session know which phone line to ring?
I thought dial plans only had local significance, but it must be passing
some info, otherwise why would line two ring when I dialed line two from
the other router. The session target doesnt specify neither port one
or two.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
OT: Question, anyone know any software that supports cisco router voip
softphone connections? I dont mean the ip phones, they need a call
manager to route the call. I think netmeeting would have the same
problem even thought it supports h.323.
I want to be able to setup plar on a ubr924, pick up a phone, and have a
remote computer ring across the state.
Michael Snyder
Lead Network Engineer
CCNP/DP, CSS1, MCSE NT/2000
Revolution Computer Systems
(270) 443-7400
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:42 GMT-3