From: Surjamukhi Chatterjea (surchatt@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:52:25 GMT-3
Janto,
Dont know if soembody got back to you on this one, but I was just studying
EIGRP stub routing, and here's what I think:
Lo0 will not be advertised by R1 to other eigrp neighbors if you use the
summary key-word. If you use the eigrp stub command without any keyword,
Lo0 will be propagated, because the default behavior is to propagates both
summary routes and connected routes.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
_c/ipcprt2/1cfeigrp.htm#79886
(watch the wrap)
If this isnt the case, somebody correct me pls.
Thx
Surja
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Janto Cin
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:31 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP Stub
Dear All,
I have question regarding EIGRP stub option.
Let say R1 have :
-Lo0 : 1.1.1.1/32
-Lo1 : 10.10.10.1/24
-Lo2 : 10.10.11.1/24
-E0 : 192.168.10.1/24
-S0 : 192.168.20.1/24
R1
-----
Int S0
Ip summary-address eigrp 1 10.10.10.0 255.255.254.0
Router eigrp 1
Redistribute connected
No auto-summary
Eigrp stub summary
Network 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
The question:
Is it correct that the Lo0 address (1.1.1.1/32) not advertised by R1 to
other EIGRP neighbor?
And when we change the eigrp stub option to 'eigrp stub connected
summary', is the Lo0 advertised?
TIA.
Janto
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:41 GMT-3