Re: [Fwd: Re: Local Area Mobility LAM]

From: Gerry Hilton (gerry.hilton@rogers.com)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 11:47:08 GMT-3


Great, thanks for the information.

Thanks,
  Gerry

DougAtHome wrote:

>In my testing, I could only get things to work with router mobile added. I
>also have a lab solution that included it. I never added bridging, nor see
>any benefit in doing so.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gerry Hilton [mailto:gerry.hilton@rogers.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 3:23 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: [Fwd: Re: Local Area Mobility LAM]
>
>
>Hi.
>
>One of the solutions for a practice lab with Mobile IP shows the router
>mobile command also being used. However, I have not seen that described
>in any config gudies. Does anyone know if that is required. The config
>is as follows:
>
>interface Ethernet0
>ip address 150.50.4.8 255.255.255.0
>ip mobile arp access-group 5
>!
>router mobile
>!
>router eigrp 10
>redistribute connected route-map selected-metrics
>redistribute mobile
>network 150.50.5.64 0.0.0.31
>network 192.168.1.0
>network 192.168.2.0
>...
>
>Also, the config guide says that bridging has to be enabled on the
>interface, but some sources and examples indicate that this is not the
>case. Is there a definitive answer on whether bridging has to be
>enabled on the interface?
>
>Thanks,
> Gerry
>
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Re: Local Area Mobility LAM
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:50:40 -0500
>From: ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
>Reply-To: ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
>To: Group Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, <Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl>
>References:
><OF7865F9B5.25276D88-ONC1256CE9.00525B72-C1256CE9.005138B6@ssk.com.pl>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>What your asking about is called LAM, Local Area Mobility, which is very
>easy. You only need to configure 1 command, ip mobile arp [options].
>
>There's an excellent write up of it
>http://www.netcraftsmen.net/welcher/papers/index.htm
>
>along with a host of other R & S topics.
>
>Hope this helps. Jim
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:02 AM
>Subject: RE: Mobile IP
>
>
>
>
>>Could you please talk me more about Mobile ARP. Any links for
>>documentation?
>>
>>Thank for help
>>
>>Wojtek
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>>Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>>2003-03-14 14:14
>>Please respond to "Scott Morris"
>>
>>
>> To: <Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> cc:
>> Subject: RE: Mobile IP
>>
>>
>>Mobile IP (e.g. the thing with FA/HA stuff) is NOT covered in the
>>Routing & Switching lab.
>>
>>Mobile ARP (Local Area Mobility) MAY indeed be covered by the lab.
>>
>>Hope that helps.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl
>>Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:14 AM
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: Mobile IP
>>
>>
>>Hi Group!
>>
>>Does everybody know a Mobile IP routing is covered by LAB? How depth?
>>
>>Wojtek



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:40 GMT-3