Re: DLSW redundacy methode-need confirmation

From: Sage Vadi (sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:49:32 GMT-3

• Next message: West, Jeff: "RE: Block one user from logging into the router."
• Previous message: Voss, David: "RE: NAT on the lab exam ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tasuka Amano Hsu: "Re: DLSW redundacy methode-need confirmation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This can also work,

Topology

R4 R3 <-- server peers
|\/|
R2 R6 <-- peers

Both tops are connect to both bottoms.

Peers

R2
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.2.0.2 cost 5 <-- I cost
more than R6
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.2.0.3 <-- sends cost info to
these peers
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.3.0.4 <-- sends cost info to
these peers

R6
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.9.0.6 cost 1 <-- I cost
less than R2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.2.0.3 <-- sends cost info to
these peers
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.3.0.4 <-- sends cost info
to these peers

Load Balance Server Peers

R4
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.3.0.4 promiscuous
*dlsw load-balance round-robin <- if costs are equal
load balance dlsw sessions

R3
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.2.0.3 promiscuous
*dlsw load-balance round-robin <- if costs are equal
load balance dlsw sessions

• Next message: West, Jeff: "RE: Block one user from logging into the router."
• Previous message: Voss, David: "RE: NAT on the lab exam ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tasuka Amano Hsu: "Re: DLSW redundacy methode-need confirmation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:40 GMT-3