From: Vadim Mikhailov (vm@lukoil.ru)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:24:07 GMT-3
Yes, it's working solution, thank you.
Though, i kept in mind some forwarding address manipulation,
for instance, setting it to 0.0.0.0
but i have not find in my network such NSSA LSA's, and i don't
know does such LSA's exist.
Best regards
Vadim Mikhailov
----- Original Message -----
From: <Wojciech.Gebka@ssk.com.pl>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: 12 ????? 2003 ?. 14:45
Subject: Re: OSPF forwarding address
> Hi !
>
> Very intresting case, I made tests in my lab. One solution to keep
> load-balancing advantage is to create a loopback interface in nssa area on
> R2 with higher ip address then addresses on any hdlc link.
>
> Wojtek
>
>
>
>
> "Vadim Mikhailov" <vm@lukoil.ru>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 2003-03-12 09:43
> Please respond to "Vadim Mikhailov"
>
>
> To: "Scott M. Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
> Subject: Re: OSPF forwarding address
>
>
> hello
> problem is:
> --hdlc--
> r1 --hdlc-- r2
> -- hdlc--
>
> all links in NSSA, R2 originates N2 0.0.0.0,
> and forwarding address in this LSA is address one of p2p links
> so, load-balancing is lost.
>
> I need to correct this strange behavior.
>
> Best Regards
> Vadim Mikhailov
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott M. Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
> To: "'Vadim Mikhailov'" <vm@lukoil.ru>
> Sent: 8 ????? 2003 ?. 17:25
> Subject: RE: OSPF forwarding address
>
>
> > Maybe I am showing some ignorance here, but can you explain in a little
> > more detail what you wanna do and accomplish?
> >
> > Thank you!
> > scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Vadim Mikhailov
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:23 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OSPF forwarding address
> >
> > Hello group,
> >
> > can i control choosing of forwarding address in NSSA LSA?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:38 GMT-3