From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:59:41 GMT-3
I don't think there is any difference, both commands refer to the peer
keepalive interval. I can't find any information on which type of keepalive
value assignment takes precedence. I will make a guess that
prom-peer-defaults takes precedence over local-peer.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tasuka Amano Hsu" <tasuka@mac.com>
To: "ccielab Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 11:58 PM
Subject: DLSw dynamic peer timeout
> Hi,
> Hwat different with these 2 command ?
>
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.1.1 keepalive 0
> dlsw prom-peer-defaults keepalive 0
>
> And if different, when I use local-peer with keepalive and when use
> prom-peer-default ?
>
> TKS!
>
> tasuka
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:37 GMT-3