RE: Voice - VAD

From: Khalid Ameen (khalid_ameen@rayaintegration.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:50:39 GMT-3


http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
multi_c/mcprt1/mcd5voip.htm#xtocid97962
Have a look at this link; it may help you with VAD

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Trygar
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:47 AM
To: Daniel Cisco Group Study
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Voice - VAD

Daniel,

"That depends"....oh, you SOB.

Whether you configure the Voice-port or dial-peer would depend on the
wording of question and proctor explanation.

You have 2 options: Voice-port or Dial-peer and you have 2 possible ends
on where to configure "no VAD".

The answers you need are:
Does the phone itself need to have Voice Activity Detection turned off?
Or When this physical phone receives any call, should there
be any data sent sent across LAN when no one is speaking?
-If yes, configure this that router's voice-port for "no VAD'.

When you dial a specific phone/phone number , do you need to have Voice
Activity Detection turned off?
-If yes, configure your router's dial-peer "no VAD".

Voice-port = phone is this router
Dial-peer = for calling phone on another router

Tom

Daniel Cisco Group Study wrote:

> If I'm asked simply to "turn off voice activity detection" on a
router, to my understanding, I would have two options:
>
> (1) Add "no vad" under the "voice-port x/x/x" config
> (2) Add "no vad" under the "dial-peer voice x voip" config (assuming
that I had these configured)
>
> Which one would be the best answer in an exam situation? (Or do I have
a wrong understanding on this?)
>
> Is there a difference? (Apart from the fact that if you used "no vad"
at the peer level, you could still use vad for other peers)
>
> I guess that doing it at the voice-port level is more of a "global"
type switch...
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:36 GMT-3