From: Daniel Cisco Group Study (danielcgs@imc.net.au)
Date: Sat Mar 08 2003 - 06:23:05 GMT-3
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
Gary,
Aside from the fact that Cisco generally recommends using CEF in most cases (unless there's something better available), CEF would give you one clear advantage in this scenario - Packet by Packet load balancing.. I've got this working really well on a customer site.
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Duncanson [mailto:gary.duncanson@avt.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 11:28
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: cisco express forwarding
If you had two sites connected by 2 x 2M links, under what circumstances would you consider using cef?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:35 GMT-3